Good afternoon everyone.
Today I want to talk about something that I have wanted to talk about for some time now. But have had to study a little bit.
I’m sure quite a few have heard the term from the movie “A few good men” When Tom Cruise is yelling at Jack Nicholson for the truth. And Jack’s response was as displayed, “You can’t handle the truth!”
Well I’m guessing everyone uses that line here and there, but what I wanted to talk about was what it meant. Especially when it comes to Christianity or any religion at all.
From the apologetic book I’m reading I came past this chapter that talked about the truth and what it has to do with real life. This is what they had to say,
“We demand truth in virtually every area of our lives. For example; we demand the truth from
- Loved ones (no one wants lies from a spouse or a child)
- Doctors (we want the right medicine prescribed and the right operations performed)
- Stock Brokers (we demand that they tell us the truth about companies they recommend)
- Courts (we want them to convict only the truly guilty)
- Employers (we want them to tell us the truth and pay us fairly)
- Airlines (we demand truly safe planes and truly sober pilots)
We also expect to be told the truth when we pick up a reference book, read an article, or watch a news story; we want the truth from advertisers, teachers, and politicians; we assume road signs, medicine bottles, and food labels reveal the truth. In fact, we demand the truth for almost every facet of life that affects our money, relationships, safety, or health.”
So what we have established so far is that, we want the truth from just about everything and every living person, because honestly, who likes to be told lies?
“On the other hand, despite our unwavering demands for truth in those areas, many of us say we aren’t interested in truth when it comes to morality or religion. In fact, many downright reject the idea that any religion can be true.”
So I have started to post comments on some videos that I tend to disagree with. And someone or a few people will come back and rebuke my claim, which then causes the argument to take place. Now I would give the person the evidence that I feel fits the argument. And you guessed it, they shove my evidence saying it hasn’t got enough strong grounds to listen to, so they change the subject. So on with the statement.
“As we’re sure you’ve noticed, there’s a huge contradiction here. Why do we demand truth in everything but morality and religion? Why do we say, “That’s true for you but not for me,” when we’re talking about morality or religion, but we never even think of such nonsense when we’re talking to a stock broker about our money or a doctor about our health?”
Now I have has a lot of people give reasons for this, because we can see the stock broker or the doctor about our problem, but having an argument over a God that “may” not exist is ridiculous. But while doing that, they also shove the idea about morality (which I will be explaining in an upcoming post).
” Although few would admit it, our rejection of religious and moral truth is often on volitional rather than intellectual grounds-we just don’t want to be held accountable to any moral standards or religious doctrine. So we blindly accept the self-defeating truth claims of politically correct intellectuals who tell us that truth does not exist; everything is relative; there are no absolutes; it’s all a matter of opinion; you ought not judge; religion is about faith, not facts! Perhaps Augustine was right when he said that we love truth when it enlightens us, but we hate it when it convicts us. Maybe we can’t handle the truth.” -Frank Turek, Norman L. Geisler.
Let’s thank our two gentleman above for their amazing statement. Now let’s get underway.
So I have always had this argument with Atheists(especially atheists), when I would try to ask them about morality, they would change the subject. My close apologist friend would have an argument with a person who would contradict themselves by saying they don’t believe in God because he is cruel, but then change their mind saying there isn’t enough evidence. I mean, come one. Get your story straight huh.
Now when I was just starting apologetics, I came past this story where Ray Comfort who is a very well known apologist asked a evolutionist how the water got here. The man’s answer was quite surprising. “The water descended towards earth on a meteorite which had liquid vapors rising from the rock, so when it made contact with the planet, the vapors burst and water was created on the land.” Okay, fair enough. But when Ray asked his next question, this is what made me laugh. “So, if the water got here by the meteor, how did the fish get here?” The Evolutionist’s response was very obvious. “I’m not answering that, that is a stupid question.” And with that he changed the subject and moved on. And funny enough later on. Ray comfort found out that he stated that the fish actually rode down on the meteor with the water vapors.
Two things, talk about absolute truth and avoiding the embarrassment of the question. And that is why he refused to answer, he was not sure on the absolute truth of it and didn’t want to sound stupid over the answer. And this is what I get from every person I comment to. Are they absolutely certain, obviously not. But then they want the absolute truth from everyone else?
So just to finish, I have told this to a lot of people in posts, and I get really criticized for it, because they think I have to have more faith than them, which I will be backing up with evidence in the coming posts.
Thank you everyone and remember.
“I don’t have enough faith to be an atheist.”